Auditability
Dispatches on auditability for AI agents in financial services.
Read this topic as JSON → Same coverage, ready for agents.
Dispatches on this topic
- WealthAi deploys in days and replaces nothing. Read that as a permission scope.
WealthAi for Advisors shipped with three claims: a 60% cut in routine client administration, deployment in days, and no need to replace the practice management system. Those claims are not independent — the third bounds the second and the second bounds the first. That is not a criticism. It is an architecture, stated in the open, for anyone who reads a release as a specification rather than a brochure.
- Every figure is calculated, not AI generated. Now publish the engine.
Altruist's new Hazel planning agent ships with a constraint rather than a capability: the model may read the client's data, but only a dedicated program may produce a number. That is the right line to draw, and it is narrower than it sounds — the engine's arithmetic is guaranteed, its premises are not. State the rule, then show the artifact that proves you followed it.
- Playbook's plays rewrite themselves: state the change-control rule before you run one
Playbook launched on 13 August with roughly 40 firms and about $660B in client assets behind it, and one sentence in the release that matters more than the rest: the platform "continuously evaluates past performance and automatically improves processes over time," deployed organization-wide. Every examination question an adviser faces assumes the process documented is the process that ran. Here is the rule to state before you deploy a workflow that edits itself.
- Savvy Intelligence and the Activation Gate: State the Rule, Then Follow It
Savvy Wealth's new agent stack surfaces actions and leaves the advisor to activate them. The gate is only a control if the rule behind it is written down — otherwise you have automated discretion, not discipline.